![]()
Everyone is still trying to process Attorney General Pam Bondi’s bizarre performance before the House Judiciary Committee yesterday.
But there was one moment in her opening statement that deserves a second look.
Bondi leaned in and essentially told lawmakers they were naïve — that while they were busy asking questions, the real war was unfolding out there in America.
“We are striking crucial blows against terrorist organizations,” she declared. MS-13. The Sinaloa cartel. Tren de Aragua. Even Antifa.
And then came the bombshell:
Cartel drones, she said, were being shot down by the U.S. military.
That’s what we should care about. Protecting America.
Cartel drones? Shot down over U.S. airspace?
If that sounds like a scene from a Tom Clancy novel, you’re not alone.
Now, to be fair, there was breaking news out of El Paso, Texas. Late Tuesday, the FAA abruptly halted all air traffic in and out of the city for ten days citing “national security reasons.” No advance notice. No public explanation. Nothing like it had happened since 9/11.
Pilots on the tarmac were stunned. Medevac flights were rerouted. Emergency operations disrupted.
Naturally, people assumed something serious had happened.
Then Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy stepped in to reassure the public. The FAA and Department of Defense had acted swiftly, he said, to address a “cartel drone incursion.” The threat had been neutralized.
The Pentagon’s tech office even posted a dramatic image: a laser beam blasting drones from the sky, a bald eagle soaring overhead, captioned “Defend the Homeland.”
Fox News ran with it. Border on the brink. Cartel drones forcing America to act after years of paralysis.
It sounded terrifying.
It just wasn’t true.
According to multiple sources speaking to The New York Times, the airspace closure didn’t stem from a cartel invasion at all. It began after immigration officials used an experimental anti-drone laser system — reportedly loaned by the Pentagon — without properly coordinating with the FAA.
And what were they firing at?
Not cartel drones.
Not an aerial assault.
Party balloons.
Plural.
Officials believed they were targeting a cartel-operated drone. It turned out to be a Mylar balloon. Later reporting indicated there may have been four of them.
Four.
So to recap: an experimental military laser weapon was deployed in commercial airspace. Flights were grounded. Emergency routes disrupted. The country was told cartel drones were attacking.
And the actual target?
Floating party decorations.
Yet in her testimony, Bondi cited the supposed drone takedown as evidence of decisive action — proof that America was under threat and this administration was protecting it.
But when the fog clears, what remains isn’t a thwarted cartel incursion.
It’s an anti-drone laser firing at balloons over El Paso.
And that raises a far more serious question:
If this is what “protecting America” looks like…
what exactly are we being protected from?