Dưới đây là Cách 2 – Viết lại nội dung theo phong cách sắc bén, mỉa mai, cuốn hút hơn, nhịp nhanh, nhấn mạnh cao trào, dựa trên toàn bộ nội dung bạn gửi:

If anyone was wondering how much Pam Bondi cares about Jeffrey Epstein’s victims, her testimony on Capitol Hill delivered a pretty clear answer.

Not much.

With the Epstein files once again dominating headlines — largely because so many figures orbiting Donald Trump seem to intersect with Epstein’s world — Bondi showed up to testify. And while Republicans treated her like a conquering hero, Democrats came armed with receipts.

On the Republican side, it was practically a standing ovation. Praise, flattery, declarations of strength. You would’ve thought the Attorney General had personally solved every crime in America.

But once Democrats began asking direct questions — especially about Trump’s relationship with Epstein — the temperature in the room changed fast.

When asked whether there were underage girls at events Trump attended with Epstein, Bondi dismissed the question as “ridiculous.” Outrageous. Preposterous. An insult to even suggest impropriety.

Yet what she didn’t do was provide clarity.

Instead, she pivoted. Minnesota. Subway crimes. Other prosecutions. Anything but the files. Anything but the names. Anything but the redactions.

And those redactions are the real story.

We now know only about half of the Epstein files have been released — and even those are heavily blacked out. Earlier claims that Trump’s name appeared fewer than 100 times have since been challenged. In fact, his name reportedly appears far more often than previously acknowledged.

That alone should raise eyebrows.

But perhaps the most revealing moment came when Bondi was asked a simple question: “Do you believe President Trump is honest?”

Her response wasn’t evidence-based. It wasn’t factual. It was deferential. “He is the Commander-in-Chief,” she said, as if the title itself answered the question.

Throughout the hearing, she repeatedly shifted to economic talking points — the Dow, the S&P, retirement accounts booming. As though stock market highs somehow resolve unanswered questions about trafficking, abuse, and accountability.

Meanwhile, Epstein survivors sat in the room.

Bondi offered words of sympathy. An apology for what they endured. An invitation to contact the FBI if they had information.

Then a Democratic lawmaker asked the survivors how many had already reached out to the Department of Justice.

Every hand went up.

How many had been granted meetings?

Not one.

That moment cut through everything.

Because this isn’t just about politics. It’s about whether justice is being pursued — or delayed. Whether files are being protected — or people are.

A recent poll shows only 6% of Americans are satisfied with how much of the Epstein files have been released. That’s not a partisan number. That’s public frustration.

The hearing could have been an opportunity for transparency. For accountability. For action.

Instead, it felt like another day of deflection.

Another day of talking around the issue rather than through it.

And the biggest question remains:

If there’s nothing left to hide…
why does it still feel like we’re only seeing half the story?